Threading problem in the new Yahoo interface
dumbledore11214
dumbledore11214 at dumbledore11214.yahoo.invalid
Wed Oct 18 13:52:13 UTC 2006
--- In HPFGU-Feedback at yahoogroups.com, "Neri" <nkafkafi at ...> wrote:
>
>
> > Ceridwen:
> > I noticed that, too, on the Banned Books thread, where it was
very
> > noticeable. I am trying out the option of sorting threads by
date,
> > which is at the top of the thread tree. It seems to work, the
> first
> > post is first, and not indented at all.
> >
> > The difficulty with this system is that the posts appear by date,
> so
> > some are very indented, while others are not.
>
>
> Neri:
> I believe I pinpointed the problem. The magic number is 30...
>
> It seems that if the thread has more than 30 posts in it, the Yahoo
> threading function gives up. It's actually very easy to see for
> yourself. Here are the directions:
>
> In the list site, click on "group by topic" (if you're not in this
> mode already). This will show you a list of the current threads,
with
> the number of posts in each thread shown in the "messages" column.
> Start entering threads, scroll down and check the "thread tree" at
> the bottom. You'll find that if the thread has 30 posts or less,
> then the thread tree looks the way it should, with upthread posts
> properly indented. If the thread has more than 30 posts, then only
30
> out of these posts will be shown. In these threads you'll often
find
> many posts one below the other that are not properly indented.
>
> (Note: it's of course possible for several posts to appear one
below
> the other with no indentation in any thread. This is OK when
several
> members answered the same post. However, if more than 10 posts one
> after the other have no indentation and they include more than one
> post from some members, this probably means it's an error.)
>
> This is obviously a bug in the new Yahoo interface. My guess is
that
> Yahoo thought there would be very few threads of more than 30 posts
> anyway, so why bother. This is probably true in small lists, where
> it's indeed rare to have very large threads. I think we have to ask
> Yahoo to fix this problem. At the minimum, if they can't show the
> whole thread properly, then they should show only the one step
> upthread post and one-step douwnthread posts.
>
>
> Neri
>
Alla:
Oh, I am sooo computer unsophisticated to put it mildly, but to test
your magic *30* I just counted the posts in this thread
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/159895
Here a_svirn replies to mine, which Yahoomort does not bother to show
already and I counted 29, or am I math challenged also? :)
Alla.
More information about the HPFGU-Feedback
archive