Observations re limits, readability, search-ability, etc

[dumbledore11214]

--- In HPFGU-Feedback at yahoogroups.com, "potioncat" <willsonkmom at ...> 
wrote:
>
>  
> > KathyK:
> > 
> > You mean like, "The Lexicon is a fantastic resource for Harry 
> Potter 
> > fans, unlike KathyK's Fictitious www.lupinkilledsirius.com which 
> > takes serious liberties with canon?"
> > 
> > Or are you talking about our own resources?  Or both?
> > 
> > KathyK, speaking only for herself
> 
> Potioncat:
> 
> Both. It could be as informal as asking it on the main list, or as 
> organized as someone asking certain members to write a posts about 
> specific sites.
> 
> It was the combination of Eddie's post here and Jeremiah's at on 
the 
> main list that made me think of it:
> 
> >>>(Post 161178, Jeremiah)  But I like it when I have some far-
> fetched idea that doesn't have a striaght forward answer and all 
> these people can unearth all this evidence! Wow-zah!<<<
> 
> Look at his enthusiasm! 
> 
> You know, it's been years since I read the welcome letter, and, 
> actually, I rarely look at our own resources. I doubt if I really 
> know what's out there. Would it be OT to discuss some of the 
> resources older members use to pull up canon? Or would this work?
>

Alla:

Duh! Read the thread, Alla, read the thread :) Never mind me, 
Potioncat.

But still, what about the books about HP? Do we want to discuss them?