Voldemort in the Mirror of Erised
caliburncy at yahoo.com
caliburncy at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 1 01:57:11 UTC 2001
--- In HPFGU-Movie at y..., Laura Klotz <laurakay76 at j...> wrote:
> So the bit with us seeing Voldemort in the mirror is technically
> okay. As to not having Quirrell turn his back on Harry, I suspect
> that it was easier (how exactly, I don't know) for the special
> effects people to CGI Voldie's face in the mirror than straight
> on. I'm not sure why that would be, but I know very little about
> special effects, so that's really just a guess.
It's been too long since I've seen the movie, as my memory is already
beginning to fade a touch.
But as I recall, it seemed to me the entire purpose in showing
Voldemort in the mirror as opposed to having Quirrel's back facing
him probably wasn't necessitated by special effects limitations . . .
rather, it struck me as a pretty clear Standard Issue Director's
Trick (tm): the point being to have Harry and Voldemort's face in the
same camera shot, which is of course not possible if Quirrel's back
is facing Harry and we have a standard shot on Voldemort's face.
I have no idea how well I explained that. Sorry. In brief, you get
the following image:
We have Harry's reflection in the mirror, with Voldemort's reflection
looming over his shoulder talking to him about how he can restore his
parents to life, as Harry is gazing into the mirror, being reminded
of same . . .
Okay, that explanation was even worse.
I concede defeat.
All I really needed is a still image of this scene and the above
would make a heck of a lot more sense.
-Luke
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive