Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) is too 'not-skinny'

ftah3 ftah3 at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 17 22:18:40 UTC 2001


Billy wrote:
> We may need a new actor to play Harry if Daniel Radcliffe puts on 
> much more weight!  In the book Harry is scrawny.  After Harry's 
fight 
> with 'you know who' Daniel is shown lying on his back.  From that 
> perspective you can see that Daniel Radcliffe is not skinny.

Eh, well, if the cast has to be *that* point-on, the fact that Daniel 
is sprouting up quickly (almost taller than Rupert/'Ron' instead of 
the other way around) should nix him.  But, for that matter, they 
cast Daniel despite the fact that he has *blue* eyes, and they do 
nothing to change his eye color in the film to green.

Personally, I think Daniel is dead-on as Harry, and I hope they don't 
let little things like height and weight change his casting (as they 
did not, apparently, due to eye color).  Imho, they're not going to 
find an absolute exact physical match, so I hope they stick to a kid 
who can bring out the essence of Harry.

Er. If that makes sense.  Sorry; I'm in a hurry!

Mahoney





More information about the HPFGU-Movie archive