Music in the movie
GulPlum
plumeski at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 21 22:57:05 UTC 2002
"Hillman, Lee" <lee_hillman at u...> wrote:
> 1. He blew this thing off. He was asked, accepted it among a bunch
of other
> projects (such as this year's Olympic theme, which is also ho-hum),
and just
> knocked it off in a weekend or two. He really didn't put a lot of
thought or
> care into the work, unlike his earlier films or projects he really
wanted to
> be associated with.
I'm not entirely sure about that. Williams is very professional and
rarely gives less than 100%. He knew this movie was going to be big,
and would have been likely to try to do his best.
As it happens, I'm not a huge Williams fan (though I am of film music)
and one of my main problems is that he very rarely holds back.
Williams is a very able composer, in that he has the talent to make
music speak to us directly. This is one reason why his scores are so
popular in their own right, as they often are "great music". But
that's not his job. For instance, whilst I absolutely abhore Frans
Zimmer's musical style (and question his talent), he does a lot for
the movies he scores by really not getting in the way. The music (if
that's what one wants to call it) is more a collection of notes
rather than a musical work in its own right. Williams simply doesn't
know how to write a piece of music which doesn't have intrinsic value.
Film directors know what they're going to get with Williams and hire
him with full knowledge of that.
> 2. Chris Columbus. I would not be surprised if Chris had been a
little timid
> about going to John and saying, "can we pull that back a bit?" the
way that
> I'm sure Stephen Spielberg or George Lucas or any number of
directors who've
> worked with Williams a lot are able to do. It's not that Williams is
> necessarily all that intimidating (though he may be, I don't know),
but
> Columbus may be a little worried about expecting too much from a
fabulously
> important composer who really doesn't want to expend any more
effort on the
> project than necessary. And he may also be aware that he doesn't
have the
> relationship with John that other filmmakers have.
err... they've worked together three times before (Home Alone I & II,
Stepmon) and although the two HAs are similar (in "feel", if not
melodically), Stepmom is very, very different.
I don't expect that Columbus was for a moment intimiated by Williams
(who, by all all accounts, is one of the easiest "stars" to get along
with in Hollywood). Williams is, however, very collaborative, and
likes dialogue with his directors. If someone doesn't understand the
use of music the way Columbus evidently doesn't, there's not much the
composer can do. The use of Williams' music in their previous work is
ample proof of this.
Besides, most of the scoring problems with HP (apart from
Williams "borrowing" a lot of material from his past work) aren't
about the music, but the sound mix in the finished product. More
often than not, the sound editors simply did an appalling bad job.
It's possible, though, that they had little choice - I recall
Columbus saying that the sound editors had a challenge in this movie,
getting rid of his constant instructions to the cast. The sound mix
could be the way it is because they had to create a new soundscape
and the easiest way was to do it with overly loud music...
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive