Washington Post/more questions (Long)
vincentjh
vincentjh at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 15 17:24:46 UTC 2002
s
p
o
i
l
e
r
s
p
a
c
e
Since the thread has turned to discussion on Columbus (and to a
certain degree, Kloves), this post will focus mostly on the two and
won't touch much on acting/actors.
Having just watched the movie, I have to say that I am glad Columbus
won't be doing the next one. It's not that CoS is so bad. It did
improve from SS/PS, but it might have to do with the fact that CoS
itself is a much more focused book than SS/PS. The kids are getting
better. The music isn't deafening. The 160 minutes aren't so hard to
sit through. Special effects are good. (So good that Columbus seems
to be reluctant to use less of them.) And Kloves is more confident in
cutting out some materials and blend a few scenes together to make it
shorter. But it lacks the intensity and edge that PoA would need.
That, I must say, is mostly the fault of K&C.
Although the first part of CoS flows quickly and smoothly, after they
got to Hogwarts, the story dragged. There are so many parts that
could have been cut shorter in order to leave room for some little
scenes that could have helped establish the characters/mood/story.
The Quidditch is exciting. But after Harry and Draco spent such a
long time chasing after each other (and being chased by the bluger),
it gets boring and pointless. The Mandrake IS important (much like
the bluger). But does the scene has to be so long? If you cut bits
and pieces here and there, there would be enough time to add scenes
showing those students' fear or the trio trying to figure out who
Riddle was and still keep the movie under 150 minutes.
Columbus said that it's a scarier movie. Scarier maybe. But not much
darker as he claimed. It can be scary if that means having giant
spiders and snake chasing people around. I, however, did not find
that very scary. The two major action sequences other than the
Quidditch game dragged so long that I began to wonder whether or not
the point of these scenes is to show off the nice work done by the
art and special effect department. At times they even feel like
crappy horror films. And I actually laughed during the chamber scene
when Harry runs into the tunnels. Is this Les Miserables?
Because there is so little emphasis on the fear and terror in
Hogwarts, we really don't get the feeling that there is something
lurking. Moreover, in the book, it's clear that everyone is more or
less "trapped" inside Horwarts, making it even more frightening. But
with so many nice panoromic shots of Hogwarts (how many times have we
seen a scene begin with a long shot panning down slowly?), it looks
like an open space with easy way out.
Since Columbus gave equal weight to every scene, it is unfocused.
When the main story line is not established clearly, it takes away
the intensity. When the story dragged, it gets even more
disconnected. At the end, CoS is, again, a collection of set pieces
without a story.
Another problem I have is with characterization. I am not sure how
much of it is because of Kloves and how much is Columbus. What I know
is that the kids' acting in general didn't bother me much.
Harry seems too brave and too calm. Especially in the forbidden
forest and in the chamber, he's so calm and so heroic that I had
trouble believing he's a 12-year-old kid. I know Harry is special.
But I loath the idea of making him a Hollywood hero.
Ron, on the other hand, is scripted to be nothing more than a comic
relief. I have major problem with that. Ron's brave. And he's smart,
too. But half of the movie, he's just scared. It not only wasted a
good character but a promising young actor. Rupert did well where he
did not have to act scared or try to be too funny. (Note the way the
Weasly brothers interact at home and his anger towards Lockhart when
L tried to escape Hogwarts. It's very natural and believable.)
However, Columbus used his "rubber face" too much and Rupert ended up
making faces most of the time. Somehow that became hard to watch
simply because he did not have to act that way.
Ron's little sister is also problematic. Her reaction after waking up
in the chamber just baffled me. Why's she so calm? (And that
dialogue. Urrrr!) In fact, the whole scene in the chamber didn't make
much sense to me. They seriously needed an action director (besides a
different writer).
When Harry got back from the tunnels (or whatever those are), he went
directly to Ginny and kneeled by her. Just when I thought he was
going to drag Ginny out of there (which should be the first thing
anyone would do), he didn't. Instead, he and TR started some lengthy
conversation. If that's not odd enough, Harry then ran himself onto
the statue when Basilisk came back. There's so much space in the
chamber, why did he choose the most difficult path? During the whole
time, I kept asking why. Why there? Why did he do that? But the
hardest thing to understand is that Harry deliberatedly stab the
diary with that fang (for three times) as if he knew clearly how to
kill TR. Yes. Once again, Harry intentionally killed someone. (Even
though, technically, TR isn't a really person.) Exactly how many
people do they want Harry to kill before he reaches legal age?
The ending has been critisized by many so I won't go there. That's
just another part that could have been cut much shorter. And the
hug/non-hug really didn't have to be there. There's little to no hint
of Ron and Herm's relation or feelings towards each other throughout
the movie. So the non-hug only seemed abrupt. I can care less about
who is going to be with whom. But if they had to add that scene, they
should've at least shown us something about Ron and Herm (such as
Ron's disaproval of Herm's crush on Lockhart) early on.
Of all the books, I'd think CoS is the easiest one to adapt. It's
more focused and shorter. But K&C didn't deliver this time. The movie
isn't all bad. It just didn't do the book (and the characters)
justice. Thankfully, a different director may bring more sparks and
edge to PoA. Now if only they can get another script writer....
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive