'Mudblood' scene
Wanda Sherratt
wsherratt3338 at rogers.com
Mon Nov 18 21:35:38 UTC 2002
I wasn't too crazy about the way this scene was done, with all the
explaning being given to Hermione instead of Ron, plus her getting
teary-eyed about it. But I have to sympathize with the moviemakers
and I think I can see why they thought they had to do that. A movie
has to SHOW things - this "racial slur" theme is important, and we
have to feel that it's important and serious. But how can we really
feel that if the people most involved don't feel it? It makes
perfect sense in the book that Hermione would be quite innocent of
what a dirty insult Malfoy had thrown at her; as someone said, her
knowledge of the wizarding world comes mostly from books, and she's
not likely to have come across this seamier side there. But there's
a danger that if the scene had been filmed the way it was written in
the book, the audience would think, "Well, if Hermione doesn't mind,
why should I? It can't be that bad after all." No, in order to
make us feel how prejudice hurts, they show us the actual hurt -
Hermione with her eyes full of tears. The other way is too
intellectual, takes too long and just doesn't work in a movie.
Maybe someone else could have pulled it off, but I think it would
have been difficult. I think this is just one of the
inevitable "flattening" moments that are bound to happen when a book
is transferred to the screen.
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive