Ron's odd violence
frantyck
frantyck at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 22 07:55:15 UTC 2002
Harry killing Quirrell in the first film, and Harry stabbing the
diary in this film are jarring acts of deliberate violence, as
various people pointed out. How about the bit in the CoS film, in
the tunnel just after the roof caves in, when Ron knocks Lockhart
unconscious with a blow to the back of the head with a chunk of
rock? This wasn't even necessary! What's doubly disturbing is that
Grint does it with such matter-of-fact dispatch. Yes, Ron's going to
be unable to get to his dead or dying sister because of Lockhart's
idiocy, but to bring oneself to pick up a rock and hit someone on
the head with it suggests more ill-suppressed anger and violence
than even a redhaired Ron is likely to have.
In small ways, Columbus and the actors are making the main
characters less comprehensible. They are deforming the link between
what we know of the characters, and the actions they take
(motivation vs. action). Or perhaps all of this is meant as early
intimation of the characters' "dark side." Either way, it's
significant.
Rrishi
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive