[HPFGU-Movie] Re: When is it a sequel?
LeeMunLim03 at aol.com
LeeMunLim03 at aol.com
Wed Apr 2 02:12:38 UTC 2003
I dont know about that but as long as they keep the same cast!!
I really dont care what you call it!
Kyle Longbottom
Hufflepuff Prefect
In a message dated 4/1/03 7:23:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, CLShannon at aol.com
writes:
>
> In a message dated 4/1/03 4:14:44 PM, bboy_mn at yahoo.com writes:
>
> <<
>
> Most sequels, as you pointed out, are simply a rehash of the same
>
> premise with new characters and new settings. The same story with the
>
> same gimmicks and usually with an ambiguous ending in case they decide
>
> to remake the same movie one more time. >>
>
> I agree and I want to add that most 'sequels' in the movie sense are not
> something that was intended when the first movie was written and produced.
> More often than not, the first one is a hit and then the production company
>
> decides to do it again, changing some plot elements, but keeping the same
> characters and basic situation. For example, Home Alone 2, Gremlins 2,
> Police
> Academy 2, 3, 4, etc. These weren't conceived as 'multiple movie events'
> from
> the beginning, they were simply produced to capitalize on the popularity of
>
> the original movie.
> In that sense, Harry Potter films aren't sequels at all - they are
> adaptations of the series of books that was originally conceived as seven
> books telling one continuous story. As for Lord of the Rings - well, that
> was
> originally all one book, so technically, the movies are all just one
> adaptation of one book. The publisher a long time ago divided it into three
>
> parts and luckily for us, New Line Cinema decided that it would take three
> films to tell the story ;-)
> Cindy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive