[HPFGU-Movie] RE: Concerns about PoA and future films

[LeeMunLim03 at aol.com]

How old do you think Shirly Henderson is?  She is not a teenager anymore!!  
Plus Tom Riddle is not that young!  Its very pluasiable to have the same cast 
until the 7th book!  Oh why would they have the teachers signed until the 4th 
film when some of them you dont need!  The ghosts Professor Flitwick!  you 
need the younger actors not the older ones!  It seems to be like okay we dont 
need Radcliffe and company but we need the adults!

Kyle Longbottom 

Hufflepuff Prefect 



In a message dated 4/20/03 1:17:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
amani at charter.net writes:

> 
> Glory:
> >Such as the idea that they would recast characters because the actors 
> >currently playing them decided they didn't want to do it anymore. I would 
> >hate for this to happen. After only two films, I've become attached to the 
> 
> >actors that play these characters, much like how I've become attached to 
> >the characters themselves in the books. To me, Daniel Radcliffe is Harry, 
> >just like Tom Felton is Draco. It would be awful for the cast to change 
> >part way through a series of films. 
> 
> Faith:
> I think there was talk of recasting in the future because the actors have a 
> 
> tendency to grow older faster than the characters in the books. While I'd 
> hate to see this happen, can you picture 'the dream team' in their 
> twenties, 
> playing school kids?
> 
> Me:
> Easily. It's done all the time in film and TV. Hell, the actor who played 
> Tom Riddle's in his late twenties (26?). By the time the trio reaches their 
> twenties, I doubt they'll be younger than 16 or so in movie-time, which 
> isn't a big problem in the film world.
> 
> --Taryn



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]