James & Lily casting
acciopotter <crookshanks731@sbcglobal.net>
crookshanks731 at sbcglobal.net
Fri Feb 21 01:27:33 UTC 2003
--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, GulPlum <hp at p...> wrote:
> My plot point is that the only reason the producers would have had
to cast
> a "name" in the less-than-cameo role of Lily is that she's going to
be
> back, with a much bigger part to play (incidentally, ditto re.
casting of
> Tom Riddle, played by a clearly non-16 year-old adult). In the
books to
> date, James looms large in Harry's thoughts whilst his mother is
just sort
> of there in the background - if the production team knew they would
have
> plans for James, they would have cast a "name", as they did for the
> remaining seemingly inconsequential roles. I therefore suspect that
in
> terms of the series as a whole, we are going to see a lot more of
Lily than
> of James.
>
> Incidentally, I suspect that PoA *might* include a flashback
further back
> to their schooldays to illustrate the Shrieking Shack revelations.
A junior
> Snape would be *very* interesting. ;-)
I agree, A junior Snape would be very interesting indeed...
I think that perhaps they cast the role of Lily to a *name* actress
because we may be reliving the scenes of and prior to Lily and James'
death. I knokw we shortly relived them in PS/SS, but I think there
will be a much more involved scene in the coming books, in order to
clarify just why LV was after them in the first place and what their
jobs were...Maybe they were preparing for OoP to be made into a film
because didn't JKR say that we will be finding out about Harry's
parents jobs and also finding out something HUGE about Lily??
Amanda
AccioPotter *who can't help typing in run on sentences when I get a
brainstorm!!!
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive