[HPFGU-Movie] Re: Vanity Fair Revisited

[Richelle Votaw]

Greicy wrote:

> Aren't they given designer clothes to choose from.  Perhaps the
photographer liked what Daniel was
> wearing and told him to stick with it?

I think it's a lot more likely that Daniel liked what he was wearing and
told them (politely, I'm sure) he'd rather keep it on than change into their
designer stuff.

Bill wrote:

> Also aren't these photo spreads, especially of and for teens,
> meant to sell things? If Dan wore a designer outfit would not
> the sales go right thru the roof? No I think Dan does what he
> wants in these situations.

Yep.  Which is why they detail everything down to the underwear if so much
as a strap shows.  It would definitely be in the magazine's best interest
for Dan to wear something from a designer.  Which is what every other person
was wearing (though Rupert's was just the shirt, it didn't say anything
about the pants).

Lynda wrote:

> interviews or photo sessions (although I have seen Dan looking > very
dapper in a suit in various pictures -- mostly from the
> Orient, as I recall.  Wonder why the
> difference?  Or were those pics from openings?)

Those pictures were all from premieres. So far Dan has worn a suit (or a
something along the line of a sports coat) to every premiere.  That includes
SS/PS London and New York premieres, and CoS premieres in London, New York,
China and Japan.  There was also at least one photo shoot where he wore a
suit.

Anne U. wrote:

> I wrote that :-) I haven't seen the VF article yet (will try to > pick it
up at Borders) but this little detail just nails it for > me. Not only does
he wear his own clothes, but he's pictured
> wearing his "hacking around" clothes and not his movie-premiere
> clothes. Mr. WYSIWYG indeed.

Ah, yes, it was you. :)  This definitely removes any doubt of that, doesn't
it?

Richelle