[HPFGU-Movie] Vanity Fair picture of trio

[Richelle Votaw]

Diana L. wrote:

> Did anyone who read the "Vanity Fair" article regarding all those 
> teenagers notice that Emma, Dan and Rupert were not mentioned at all 
> in the actual text accompanying the article?  Admittedly, I only 

There was only one mention, just about two or three lines.  Part of it was the quote that is on the picture itself, "Where would the Harry Potter movie series be without Emma Watson's bossy boots."  

> I noticed that Emma was the youngest teen who was profiled and that 
> Daniel was the second youngest.  

Yes, and I'm fairly certain that Daniel as second youngest was still the only one born in 1989.  Rupert was either third youngest or within a few months, I believe there was one other teen born in 1988.

> P.S. A note to 'Vanity Fair':  the 'teen' who was born in 1977 is 
> NOT a TEEN! He may play one on TV, but he's still not a teenager!  
> And neither are the 'teens' born in 1981 and 1982. 

I thought the same thing!  Can we stretch that one more year?  I was born in 1976, am I still a teen too?  What they play on TV has nothing to do with whether they are teens or not!  However, if we use Vanity Fair rules, Daniel can safely play Harry Potter for at least 12 more years. :)  Considering I didn't think that 25 year old guy looked much younger than he was.

Richelle


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]