[HPFGU-Movie] I found a complaint address!!!!!
CLShannon at aol.com
CLShannon at aol.com
Sat Mar 8 02:10:28 UTC 2003
In a message dated 3/7/03 5:45:54 PM, crookshanks731 at sbcglobal.net writes:
<< No Fudge at the
Leaky Cauldron..no Wood now, which obviously means no quidditch, and
don't even get me started on Gary Oldman..shudder! >>
Why does no Wood mean no quidditch? I don't think that he 'is' the game
itself. Sure, we won't have his obsession over the cup or his emotional
response to the win, but surely he doesn't 'own the rights to the game' ;-) I
think they can still play without any of the previous players being
identified except Harry, when it comes right down to it ;-)
Now if they come out and say that there is no quidditch in the movie, then
that's different, but that hasn't happened.
Cindy
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive