[HPFGU-Movie] Am I the only one?

[LeeMunLim03 at aol.com]

And sending complaints to WB because of your own particular 
preference of casting? Geez....what makes you think your vision is 
more right than others to complaint? I for one is VERY satisfy at the 
casting myself. How about wait till you see the actual performance of 
the actors when the film opened! It's not like your complains will 
change ANYTHING about it. 

It may make a difference!  You never know!  I don't think my vision is more 
right or wrong but I would like to see the director commit to being faithful 
to Harry Potter!  Chris Columbus said he would see the movies all the way to 
the end and he hasn't done that!

am I really the only one who think the deletion of Oliver Wood will 
NOT play a vital factor in the quality of the film at all?!?! Are 
some of you really serious when you said the film is "ruined" because 
there'll be no Wood!?!

I don't think the film is ruined, but why cut wood when in the Goblet his 
already gone from the books???  How many more deletions will we have??  Is 
Draco next!  Tom (Draco) says his not coming back for the Goblet of fire and 
then is says his staying to complete the series!  Why have the same actors in 
all 3 movies then?  Why not change the characters?  What about the intergrity 
of the film?  

Kyle Longbottom 




In a message dated 3/8/03 1:54:58 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
dkewpie at pacbell.net writes:

> am I really the only one who think the deletion of Oliver Wood will 
> NOT play a vital factor in the quality of the film at all?!?! Are 
> some of you really serious when you said the film is "ruined" because 
> there'll be no Wood!?!
> 
> Honestly, I really don't understand what the fuss with all these 
> complaining about Wood not being in POA at all. Really, for those who 
> overreact at that please think about this: is Wood really THAT 
> important and vital to the major plot!? PoA is a much longer story 
> than PS and CoS, it introduced essential new  
> characters/creatures/flashback of the past, in comparison, Wood is 
> completely a disposable elements to the story.
> In CoS movie he has only like at most 1 mintues of appearance or so. 
> Therefore if Wood is in PoA, he'll just be a walking cardboard 
> anyways. What's the point to keep him then?
> 
> Besides, who says no Wood = no quidditch? quidditch game could still 
> be shown totally without Wood! Remember CoS? He had 5 secs or so on 
> screen time in it, and his appearance really contribute nothing much 
> except for serving eye candy for fangirls.
> 
> I for one could REALLY live without him at all, as well as the whole 
> quidditch cup thing. Yes it's still essential to show segments of the 
> game to the dementors part, but a long game with start and finish is 
> really too redundant. Do we really need to see the Quidditch cup!? 
> What's so important about it compare with other more important things 
> like character development and history of MWPP? We have seen 2 
> quidditch games already and the freshness of "sport with racing 
> broom" is really wearing off (at least to me), I for one was bored at 
> the Quidditch scene in CoS (and it's so loooonnnggg) and whenever I 
> re-watch PS I always skip the quidditch parts. The Quidditch has 
> become so predictable that everyone knows the Gryfinddor will win and 
> Harry will caught the Snitch ANYWAYS! 
> 
> And sending complaints to WB because of your own particular 
> preference of casting? Geez....what makes you think your vision is 
> more right than others to complaint? I for one is VERY satisfy at the 
> casting myself. How about wait till you see the actual performance of 
> the actors when the film opened! It's not like your complains will 
> change ANYTHING about it. 
> 
> Joan
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]