Direct-to-Video & Cast Changes (was) The Importance of Being Flint
Petra Pan
ms_petra_pan at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 28 04:52:51 UTC 2003
Kyle:
> Why is Inspector Gadget going
> straight to home viewing instead
> of being in theatres??? Why is
> The never ending story in home
> viewing if its such a good film
So...you would have us believe that
Warner Bros. will never make changes
to the HP movie cast over the course
of 7 films because once you point
out their folly to them, WB would
surely want to avoid the
'inevitable' fate of direct-to-
video that befalls inexorably all
sequels that change cast members?
Are you quite sure that the cast
change from Matthew Broderick to
French Stewart is the reason IG2
never got a theatrical release?
See, IMNSHO, it's more likely the
decision to NOT release IG2 in the
theaters is the reason for the cast
change...NOT the other way around.
The fact that IG1's box office take
is not good enough to warrant the
gamble of a 2nd try at a theatrical
release is probably the reason that
the studio didn't shell out the
money for Broderick. Whether IG2
was destined for the big screen or
the small screen first is a decision
made, most likely, before casting
even began. Gotta have a budget
y'know.
If you want us to join in your
crusade, you must first present us
with solid and compelling reasons.
Your argument that changes in the
cast will make such an impact on the
final product that Warner Bros. will
have no choice but to release the
inferior film on DVD/VHS instead of
the big screens is supported by
citations of movies that are not at
all equivalent to the HP movies.
Go to
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/
and compare the amount of money made
by IG1 and HP1/HP2. These two
franchises are in no way shape or
form going to follow the same
business model. How can they
possibly?
Why does this matter? Because
neither you, I, nor presumably
anyone else reading this list have
the money to bankroll our own
version of HP. Until you do have
the money, before you tell a
corporation how they should spend
money that isn't yours, perhaps
m'dear, you should look much more
carefully into all the factors that
influence that corporation in its
decision making process.
In other words, why should Warner
Bros. take you seriously as someone
whose advice they should heed in how
they grow their assets? I don't say
this to be mean...I say this to
direct your attention to a weak spot
that needs some shoring up.
Or avoid exposure of: Don't weaken
your own argument by going into this
area of business and financial
planning - your strongest point is
your opinion that changes in the
cast will alienate fans like
yourself who are consumers of the
franchise.
Take Moody's advice: Play to your
strength.
Petra
a
n :)
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive