[HPFGU-Movie] Re: new uniforms? & new Dumbledore

[LeeMunLim03 at aol.com]

In a message dated 5/26/03 6:12:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
doliesl at yahoo.com writes:

> 
> 
> >Well then tell Joan to not say the lords name in vain.  I will keep 
> it civil 
> >but when she says something like that it makes me angry!!  Plus 
> where is the 
> >logic if the decide to change Neville or Seamus????!?!?  I am hot 
> under the 
> >collar becuase J.K Rowling said keep it in the frame of harry 
> potter and keep the 
> >cast british.  Now you have two directors and there going in two 
> different 
> >directions.  Why is everybody so angry at not having Quidditch??  
> 
> 
> 
> Kyle, for ohe last time, there WILL BE QUIDDITCH! David Heyman, Dan 
> Radcliffe and Chris Columbus have all confirmed it. Repeat after 
> me, "There will be quidditch in PoA!", chant this in your sleep ;), 
> it'd help your blood-pressure.


No it won't no fricken wood!!  We raised bloody hell now we have quidditch 
but still no wood!  Everybody was telling me that we can't change things we just 
did!!  You still believe we can't bring back wood??

> 
> Also Kyle can you give us the links to where you see Seamus and 
> Neville's actors were changed? Chances are that you did not find any, 
> right? (what are you worrying about?)


I was using an example

> 
> Can you grasp the understanding that film-making is a collective 
> effort, it's about many things that worked together. So a slight 
> little changes in prop design, or recasting some minor background 
> nobodies ("Tom the innkeep" who?) are LEAST likely going to ruin the 
> film.


Yes I can I am not stupid!  Well we changed a new major cast memeber.  So 
your saying to me that people are going to see the film regardless of who plays 
harry potter in the goblet of fire??  well I wont.  This is just the begining 
of the changes that will constanly change and its going from bad to worse and I 
know I am in the minority here 
> 
> 
> >like Batman without his symbol of the bat.  Now I know J.K Rowlings 
> did the 
> >books but she didnt do the movie!  People think she owns the rights 
> to Harry 
> >potter the movies and she doesnt Warner Brothers does not her!  She 
> owns the books.
> 
> *Please* Chris Columbus does not OWN Harry Potter, his interpretation 
> are NOT the one and only final ways, and shouldn't be taken as 
> the "canon".  He interpret his own version for the 1st two films. But 
> now PoA is Alfonso's vision, not Columbus anymore. Plus Columbus's 
> the producer of the film now, and he seems to pass "greenlight" to 
> all of Alfonso's decisions. So your problem is: overreacting. Some of 
> the claims you made are mostly illogical and unreasonable, such as 
> complaining about change of cast when there aren't. Calm down, okay?


You wont excited to see all the same cast in the chamber of secrets including 
the train conductor??  Oh J.K rowlings owns everything of harry potter???  As 
I understand it the company Warner Brothers own the rights to the 3 books so 
they can be made into a movie.  J.K Rowlings owns the books not the live 
action characters.  Do you really think Chris is going to go against Alfonso 
decisions??

First of all you all say to me we can't change Afonso decison to leave out 
quidditch becuase there a big monster now all of a sudden Alfonso is bending a 
little for us.  So you say we can't get Wood in the Prisoner still??  

> 
> As many people has tell you before, most people have faith in 
> Alfonso, as we see him being a better artist than Columbus. 
> As a reader, we all have our own vision of HP in our head, just 
> because Columbus brought the 1st two in his ways, does not mean 
> Alfonso has to be slave to what Columbus has started (neither do you 
> as an audience). So Alfonso is welcome to change things accordingly. 
> And so far the changes he made are *NOT* stretched at all. (let me 
> remind you, Heyman and Columbus both "okay" Alfonso's decision in 
> order for him to proceed)


I just wonder what there saying now??  You really never see or hear the truth 
of the matter until there dead or the movie has been made.    
> 
> 
> D.
> 

Kyle Longbottom 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]