acting; to research or not to research
serenadust
jmmears at comcast.net
Thu Aug 12 12:57:05 UTC 2004
--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, Valerie Flowe
<valerie.flowe at v...> wrote:
> From: "Theresa" <anmsmom333 at c...>
> <snip>
> But personally, if I was going to play a
> character, I would read the books first.
>
> [from Valerie]
> I know! If you have source material, why not use it? If you are
bringing a
> literary character to life, why not discover him through the eyes
of the
> author/creator? You are inevitably going to put your own flavor on
it
> anyhow.
I think the problem is that the actor's job is not to play the
character in the book, it's to play the character in the
screenplay. There are often significant differences between the
two, as the PoA movie so richly demonstrated. It could be that the
actor doesn't want to be put in the position of having to reconcile
those differences, and I think that's a legitimate approach.
In effect, it's impossible to serve two masters (ie, book author vs
screenplay/director), and that's not what the actor is being paid to
do.
Jo Serenadust
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive