Thewlis said what??

[Marci]

I think his comments were more in line with it will be harder for 
Daniel to have that career after Harry Potter.  I think Dan improved 
big time in POA and the directing had a little to with it.  Rupert 
has been consistent since the beginning and that might stand out to 
Thewlis.  It certainly does to me.  Maybe he watched them do certain 
scenes and noticed how many takes and blah blah blah?  His line 
delivery is smoother than the others' as well (I think).  Don't get 
me started on Emma Watson.  At some points in POA, she was definitely 
good.  But she is still not consistent.  I can't stand her "ancient 
runes" speech on the way to COMC.  I was happy she improved though.

Marci

 "jeanico2000" <jheiler at s...> wrote:
> > SNIP > 
> >
> >I'm a wee bit annoyed with David Thewlis making  comments that 
> >Rupert is the best of the three and others knocking the crying  
> scene, etc.  I don't know why Thewlis has the opinion that only 
> Rupert has  the chance of an acting career after the Harry Potter 
> movies are  done
> 
> OK, well that kind of threw me for a loop. I never read this quote 
> before, and before I get all hot and bothered over it, I imagine 
> that this was maybe taken out of context? I hope? because 
otherwise, 
> IMO, David Thewlis doesn't know what he's talking about (I dislike 
> people who back stab their co stars as a general rule). Don't get 
me 
> wrong... Rupert does a really good job and, to me, is "Ron par 
> excellence". And Emma is a fine young actress. But Daniel is better 
> than good... he did an amazing job in POA and, again IMO, will have 
> a really great acting career if he decides to pursue one. His 
> portrayal of Harry is superb (and for those who want to see him 
cry, 
> just watch him closely when Lupin is talking to him about his mum 
> and dad).           
> 
> Just my two cents worth!
> Nicole
> Who no longer likes David Thewlis until further notice