Messrs M, W, P & P
dowen331
mailowen at aol.com
Fri Jun 25 00:54:31 UTC 2004
--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, GulPlum <hp at p...> wrote:
> Something which surprised me (I have been unforgivably *S-L-O-W*!)
is that
> it took eight viewings of the movie for me to realise that the PoA
movie
> *completely* misses any identification of James, Sirius & co as the
authors
> of the Map or that all four of them became Animagi at the same
time, or
> that there was any connection between these elements, or that they
were
> connected in any way to Lupin's lycanthropy.
>(large snip of excellent discourse)
> --
> GulPlum AKA Richard, ending this a bit abruptly but wanting to get
it out
> before leaving home for five days
I very much appreciated your thoughts on why the animagi explanations
could be put off to the next movie, and agree with you on the danger
of too much information getting put into one scene. (Watching the
LOTR film commentaries has taught me alot about the decisions
directors and screenwriters must make!)
However, with the elimination of the MWPP explanation, there was one
glaring hole for me in the POA movie. When Harry produced his
patronus, there was no explanation given that his father had been a
stag animagi. As I recall, there was reference that he thought he
saw his father, but you never learned the significance of the stag.
For that matter, they only showed the stag once; the other patronus
shots were that "shield" effect. I thought that was a major flaw in
the film, since that makes the whole patronus thing so much more
emotional.
And by the way (picking up from another thread), I too was really
upset that so many of Harry's lines were given to Hermione. She did
all the thinking and he got dragged along. What a twisting of the
characters!
DebbieO
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive