Harry's wand
artsylynda at aol.com
artsylynda at aol.com
Sat Sep 4 01:43:56 UTC 2004
In the first two movies, Harry had a rather plain looking wand, and
according to canon, it was 11 inches, holly, phoenix feather core (as we all know).
The point here is the 11 inches, and the fact that the initial wand was quite
plain, just a turned handle and a smooth shaft (I guess you'd call it). I
noticed in PoA the wands were much more ornate (very pretty, where the ones in
the first two films were plain and "workmanlike" not fancy), with vines
carved down the length of the wands, and fancier handles. I just followed a link
that was on Leaky (here's the URL to the wand I'm talking about:
_http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7005&catid=21_
(http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7005&catid=21) ) and not only are
the wands more ornate (they have copies of Hermione's and Ron's wands for sale
too), but they say this wand is 14 inches long -- that's the length of
Voldemort's wand (according to canon -- I've been re-reading Sorceror's Stone
lately). I just found that interesting in all kinds of ways, for some reason.
I'm tossing it out here in case anyone wants to speculate on why (in Harry's
world) his wand might have "grown" with him. I think the filmmakers just
wanted the wands to be bigger because the kids are bigger, most likely. I
wondered if anyone had any other interesting ideas on the subject.
Lynda
"The cat's among the pixies now." Mrs. Figg, OoP
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive