3rd time's a charm- I've finally got some questions
susanbones2003
rdas at facstaff.wisc.edu
Fri Dec 2 23:42:29 UTC 2005
--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, nicholas dean <nicholas at a...>
wrote:
>
> >Lauren said:-
> >
> >And to make a comment- I loved the second task, my only quibble
with
> >it is the "precious things" to be saved. They looked a little
scary,
> >like they were dead or something. I didn't even recognize
Hermione,
> >or Cho. When I read the book, I imagined them to be sweetly
sleeping-
> >like, heads lolled to the side, gently bobbing in the currents,
> >dribbles of bubbles escaping their mouths like itty snores. (I
think
> >it was described pretty closely to that!) This scene gave me a
bit of
> >a jolt.
>
> The recent 'Making of...' programme on British TV (one whole hour,
> amazingly!) dwelt at length upon the filming of this sequence. Dan
> Radcliffe actually did all of the swimming that you saw Harry
doing
> in the movie in short 15- to 20-second bursts, with scuba divers
> standing by to shove a regulator (breathing apparatus) into his
mouth
> when needed. When it came to tying up the four hostages
underwater,
> however, it was felt that it would be too dangerous; so they used
> dummies. Any diver will tell you, however, that shapes are
distorted
> and colours are bleached under water, and Caucasian skin looks
> lifeless. The 'hostages' did look odd, but not necessarily
> unrealistic.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicholas
First time through, I too, thought the hostages looked like bad wax
musuem manaquins, but the next time, I looked at them more as "in
suspended animation" which they'd have had to be, to last
underwater. It didn't seem so jarring. I was thoroughly impressed
with the sequence and relieved that it didn't last as long as it did
in the book. The shark was very realistic by the way. Made me jump.
JenD
>
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive