No subject

[dragonjcndm2 at aol.com]

Richard:

<<Voldemort's identity had been established in the second movie, and 
the producers deemed this sufficient.>>

True, but it's not mentioned at all in the third movie (or book, for 
that matter), so I don't think it would be out of order for Voldemort 
to make some reference to his being named after his father at some 
point during the graveyard scene (perhaps when he admits that he 
killed him, which isn't mentioned at all in the movie).

Irrelevant. Most fans who have seen the previous films can undoubtedly update themselves by watching Chamber of Secrets to be reminded. I don't see how every film has to be reminded when a detail has already been mentioned (unless it's really extremely important). In fact, I find that kind of annoying. As it is, I haven't found any movie watcher question Tom Riddle on the tombstone just yet. Then again, the DVD has yet to reveal extra cut scenes.
 
Jade


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]