[HPFGU-Movie] Re: POV: Dan and Dakotta, and Morality

[Candle]

--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <bboyminn at ...> wrote:
>
> At the American Chronicle, young writer Samuel Van Eerden has 
voiced
> his  opinions on the corrupting influences of Hollywood, and
> specifically on recent decisions made by Dan Radcliffe and Dakota 
Fanning.
> 
> Since Dan's role in Equus was recently discussed her, and the
> consensus seemed to be that we wished him well and welcomed the
> change. Samuel Van Eerden has a decidedly different view on the 
matter.
> 
> 
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?
articleID=12465
> 
> Just passing it along.
> 
> Steve/bboyminn
>

I hope that Dan doesn't ruin his career. It's unfortunate, but the article did point out that some people have stalled their careers by the choices that they have made. I do feel bad for Dakota. I wonder how she will deal with it. Back when Jodi Foster did "Taxi" her sister was her body double in the rape scene. Then they used Jodi for the "aftershock" of the rape scene. She said in an interview that they had a psychologist on set to make sure that she was okay, but that she didn't even know that she had been raped until she saw the movie and then thought something about "oh, that is why I was upset." I hope it's not to intense for Dakota and that she can deal with it, Oscar or not.

Candle 
   
  May there always be a light to guide you.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]