Cuts and Bruises

[starjackson1]

Very well put Jen!  I got quite a shock at the bathroom scene - I 
have seen GOF four times now, and every single time that scene hits 
the screen, there are murmurs in the audience. You are just not 
prepared for it. 

It's kind of a shock to realize these kids have grown up!  They hit 
puberty!  When I look back on the pictures when Dan, Rupert, and 
Emma first got their roles - they were so small and cute! What 
happened!?! LOL!

I would not be surprised if Dan did a little bit of weight lifting 
for the much talked about bathroom scene.  Actors do that all the 
time when they have to be naked (or semi-naked) in a movie.  

And yes, Dan and Harry are two VERY different people. I love Dan to 
death, but I think Harry is much cuter!  

> >Hi there Roxane,
> I think Movie Harry is quite nice looking and definitely an action 
> hero where as, Book Harry is a little less put-together. In GOF, 
> he's referred to by Fluer as "zis leetle boy." His hair is often 
> said to be a mess and whilst he has his mother's eyes, he doesn't 
> appear to have the aplomb and confidence of his dad. That may be 
> because we first meet his dad as a 15 year old, a member of the 
> wizarding world, in the know and sure of himself. Harry's not 
that. 
> I surely hope we see enough of Sirius before his demise to 
establish 
> that Harry and his dad are different. Just listening to OOTP, you 
> can hear the disappointment in an almost delusional Sirius that 
> Harry's not the crazy risk-taker his dad was. And then you think, 
> his dad didn't have the worst dark wizard ever after him since 
> birth. No, that only came about later. So James can afford to be 
> carefree, happy-go-lucky, arrogant and self-centered as he was at 
> 15. I surely hope we get to see that contrast. 
> 
> And about looks, Dan and Harry are two different people. It comes 
> out so clearly when you see dapper little Dan at the premiers in 
his 
> shiny suits and his very swishy appearance. Harry is rougher 
around 
> the edges, carries himself differently, almost, well almost burly. 
> He's got more muscles than Dan (do not know how that works, but he 
> does seem bulkier...). It's a great thing to say that Dan can and 
> does go into character and the two are very well-defined. I love 
> seeing Dan in interviews. He talks a mile a minute and he's so 
glib! 
> And then you realize how easy he makes it look, to become Harry, a 
> man of much fewer words. We in America are very accustomed to 
> getting our characters and the "stars" who play them mixed up. 
It's 
> a marketing strategy. I am always very relieved to see Dan has his 
> own person and that it's very different from Harry.
> Jen D. > 
> > 
> > >
> >
>