dark films
susanbones2003
rkdas at charter.net
Fri Mar 10 22:58:02 UTC 2006
Hi Sports Fans:
This is a conversation Karen and I began having off list when we
realized it belonged up on the list. Karen started it in regards to
my remark that HP didn't rule her life.
Karen writes:
...I am a serious fan
though a late comer. I quite honestly have in the past few months
been non-stop Harry. Mostly rereading to get the drift of her
writing. I consider her right up there with my other favorite author
Anne McCaffery. I love to reread writing and see just what it is
that makes it tick. And the movies of course, just are so perfectly
cast that it enhances the reading. You don't get a combination like
that very often. I do think that the film, having done SO well, will
convince the studio that they can have them be darker.
Jen D. writes:
Hey Karen,
Again this is a post and I promise to put it up but you have to let
me quote you. I object to calling the movies "dark." I feel that if
a movie is dark, it gives the impression there is no hope. And I
think most of the time, the film makers have done a good job of
catching the tone of the books. The first two, while full of the
discovery of the WW, certainly had their moments of suspense and
tension and obviously,
moments where Harry faced some great dark wizard or beastie but I
have heard increasingly how wonderful it was that Harry is getting
darker!. This bothers me because Harry is about good, and how good
will triumph. That's why he can not be bought by the ministry, which
is about self-preservation and if saving the WW gets in the way,
then so much the better. Yes, the confrontations with LV are getting
more and more intense and have been done very well in the last film
but ultimately, it's the confrontations we are seeing (and the
attendant menace that preceeds) and we are calling the films dark
because of it. As each film follows the books, yes, it's always
darkest before the dawn and the sense of dread grows, but these
aren't dark books or dark films. Am I making any sense? We can read
Anne Rice for that sort of stuff. Wholely dark stuff, literature and
films that exist to glorify evil is not my cup of tea. I wouldn't
read or watch Harry if I thought he were a champion of the darkness.
It may seem like I have gone off a bit but I have just heard people
describe the movies as "increasingly dark" as if they are becoming
increasingly unsavory and yippee for that! No. Each book, if you
want the truth, brings us closer to LV's destruction and that's a
good thing. I hope the WW can reform itself so another LV doesn't
have the chance to rise but before that, this one has to be
destroyed and that's not a happy thing, but a necessary thing, not
the action of someone who relishes the dark. I don't know if this
makes sense. I do appreciate the very evil presentation they made of
LV. I wouldn't want him the least bit approachable. Yet, one can see
how a broken or marred individual could find his sort of deception
attractive. So while they have to be honest about LV,
I just don't want to perpetuate the concept that these are dark
movies. There will be more frightening things happening, no doubt
but they are needful. I have talked too much. This will turn into a
post.
J
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive