[HPFGU-Movie] Digest Number 1438
OctobersChild48 at aol.com
OctobersChild48 at aol.com
Fri Mar 17 11:16:54 UTC 2006
In a message dated 3/16/06 3:11:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com writes:
> I couldn't stand the WS version. I guess it all depends on
> the TV you have. Hubby jokingly admitted that it was cheaper to buy
> a second DVD than a new TV! Smart marketing move from WB, that...
> although I don't agree with it. I wonder how many other fans are now
> sitting at home with both versions! :o)
> Nicole
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I'm one of them. I, too, bought the two-disc special edition, but I hate
widescreen so I had to get the fullscreen disc too. I am really pissed at the way
WB is marketing this movie. If it isn't bad enough that the two-disc set costs
so much more than the single disc, you can't even choose which format you
want it in. The first three movies were the two disc sets in your choice of full
or wide screen and they cost twenty bucks. Now you pay $20 for a single disc
and my special edition set cost $25 before tax and I went through hell finding
it close to where I live and work. The single disc was no problem, we sell it
where I work. I love any and everything Harry Potter but I am starting to get
really put-out at what it is costing. There was no question, though, that I
would buy the special edition, and I think that the special features disc is the
best one yet, although I wish they would have included more of the deleted
scenes, or at least better ones than they did.
Sandy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive