[HPFGU-Movie] Digest Number 1438

OctobersChild48 at aol.com OctobersChild48 at aol.com
Fri Mar 17 11:16:54 UTC 2006


In a message dated 3/16/06 3:11:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com writes:


> I couldn't stand the WS version. I guess it all depends on 
> the TV you have. Hubby jokingly admitted that it was cheaper to buy 
> a second DVD than a new TV! Smart marketing move from WB, that... 
> although I don't agree with it. I wonder how many other fans are now 
> sitting at home with both versions! :o) 
> Nicole    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

I'm one of them. I, too, bought the two-disc special edition, but I hate 
widescreen so I had to get the fullscreen disc too. I am really pissed at the way 
WB is marketing this movie. If it isn't bad enough that the two-disc set costs 
so much more than the single disc, you can't even choose which format you 
want it in. The first three movies were the two disc sets in your choice of full 
or wide screen and they cost twenty bucks. Now you pay $20 for a single disc 
and my special edition set cost $25 before tax and I went through hell finding 
it close to where I live and work. The single disc was no problem, we sell it 
where I work. I love any and everything Harry Potter but I am starting to get 
really put-out at what it is costing. There was no question, though, that I 
would buy the special edition, and I think that the special features disc is the 
best one yet, although I wish they would have included more of the deleted 
scenes, or at least better ones than they did.

Sandy


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





More information about the HPFGU-Movie archive