Dan's acting, and other observations
susanbones2003
rkdas at charter.net
Tue May 2 11:21:10 UTC 2006
SNIPPED
>
> kchuplis:
>
> The biggest problem with that scene was that it did NOT exist in
the
> book, there was no reason for Harry TO cry at that point and it was
> very obviously pressed into the story by the director. Yes, this
was,
> IMO, Curzon's biggest crime in PoA and since it did not come
> organically to the scene, there is little hope that it could come
> organically to the actor. I'm not sure a seasoned actor could have
> infused that with true pathos actually. So, I sure wouldn't hold
that
> one against Dan.
>
Karen,
Did you read past the embarrassing remark? I said there was no good
reason to allow that scene to exist! I am with you on this. Dan
shouldn't have taken the fall. They could have fixed it so easily! Why
was Dan made to take that embarrassment, that's the big question.
Crying is one of the things actors have to do occasionally and they
aren't faucets. Sometimes it's very difficult to summon up the
necessary emotion to start the tears (or appropriate sounds, as it
were). Now if AC had so much devotion to this invented scene (with all
the other good stuff in the book, why did that guy have to create his
own emotional scene? Smacks of arrogance to me...) why didn't he make
sure the darn thing worked? I think Dan has so much potential, so much
he can give to HP and I just really hate to see his contribution
squandered.
Jen D.
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive