New interview with Dan, Katie and David Yates

lilypo2007 lilyp at superig.com.br
Mon Sep 4 04:40:18 UTC 2006


-
> And now Lauren: 
> 
> I think the problem is that the press focuses greatly on the movies, 
> as opposed to the books.  [...]
> 
> As a fan who came to the wizarding world from watching the film POA, 
> I feel that I am a fan of two different types of Harry Potter.  The 
> movie fan in me doesn't have a clue of Movie Harry & Movie Ginny's 
> impending relationship (but book fan me does and loves it!).  Movie 
> fan Lauren doesn't know who Ludo Bagman is, doesn't have a clue 
> where Dobby has been, and thinks Ginny and Neville are seemingly 
> unimportant characters (even when Hermione screams at Mad-Eye in 
> class about the Cruciatus Curse- why did she do that?).
> 
> Any thoughts?  Like I said, just my two knuts.

Yes, I understand. But Ginny was important in film two. Even if the
reporter has just seen the films, he would have to know her name. But,
as a reporter, he must know what people want to know about the film
and I doubt a kiss is such a thrilling thing. He would have to have
heard about an important death in book five, for instance. And he
could just ask the director and Dan about what important scenes they
would like to mention. But all he wanted to know  about was the kiss
and the relationship between Dan and Katie. 

What kind of a question was "Is he a good kisser"? What could Katie
possibly answer? And, of course the press concluded a lot of *** from
her obvious answer.

These are just a few examples why I think the opportunity of
interviewing the director, Dan and Katie was given to the wrong
person. And I'm frustrated, because I want to know more about Sirius
and Ginny in the film and I'm sure the press won't make the right
questions.
Lilyp








More information about the HPFGU-Movie archive