DH Movie Speculation

dumbledore11214 dumbledore11214 at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 7 16:29:12 UTC 2007


Steph:
<SNIP>
Yes, PoA is a wonderful book. No argument there. But what difference
does it make if things are moved at Hogwarts? Every director since
Columbus has done extensive remodeling, as you put it. I didn't love
the shrunken head (but FWIW JKR said she wished she'd thought of it
herself), but there were so many other wonderful shots, such as the
flower that freezes up as the dementor goes by. The trio's acting was
the best out of the first three films as well. The story moved along
with out any dead spots.

<SNIP>

Alla:

If I may briefly interject, I also would prefer Yates to come back, 
but I did think that POA had the spirit of the story just fine, they 
just cut the Marauders way too much IMO.

But the darkness and the Trio growing up, etc and beatiful shots - 
loved it.

Have to disagree about Trio's acting though. I love Dan's work, but I 
thought his crying was horrid, I thought that even his sobbing in GoF 
was so much better already and thought that in OOP he improved even 
more and did phenomenal job.

Was never a fan of Emma's acting, I mean she is okay visually as 
Hermione for me, but I was never very impressed and still not.

And I do think Rupert is very good.


Alla, 

who will never ever complain about anything in Harry Potter movies 
which she had seen, after she saw the so called adaptation of 
the "Dark is Rising". GRRRRRRR.





More information about the HPFGU-Movie archive