[HPFGU-Movie] Re:The picture of Dan that isn't cropped
Karen
kchuplis at alltel.net
Sat Mar 10 00:16:53 UTC 2007
On Mar 9, 2007, at 4:58 PM, Geoff Bannister wrote:
> --- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, "Lizzie Mae Lilly"
> <lizzy1933 at ...> wrote:
>>
>> --- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, "Karen" <kchuplis@> wrote:
>>>
>>> I honestly can't see that one follows the other here. I remember my
>> mom
>>> accidentally walking in on my nephew in the bath at Dan's age
>>> (and he
>> was
>>> taller, but about that body build) and later commenting "whoa, he is
>>> "well-developed". :D But we will never know will we! LOL!
>>>
>>
>> I gather from this that you actually believe that Dan would pose
>> in the
>> nude?
>>
>> Frankly, I don't. A discreet nude scene in a play is a whole lot
>> different from a photo which will live forever on the internet.
>>
>> Lizzie
>
> Geoff:
> He was in the nude for those promotional views. It quite clear
> because you can see his hips and hence the fact that he is not
> wearing trousers.
>
>
Here's another bit of proof. (not frontal)
http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article.html?
in_article_id=37669&in_page_id=7
I remember seeing a long time ago a very nude (but cropped) pic of
Dan (and it was a real production type shot) when he was probably 12
or so. I don't think he (or his parents ) have trouble with
purposeful, tasteful nudity.
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive