[HPFGU-Movie] Re: Prince delayed
mugg1eb0rn at aol.com
mugg1eb0rn at aol.com
Fri Aug 15 02:06:17 UTC 2008
In a message dated 8/14/2008 9:19:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jade76_2000 at yahoo.com writes:
Yep....Harry Potter 6 is going to suffer. New films slated for Summer 2009:
Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
X-Men: Origins
Terminator: Salvation
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
Star Trek
G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra
Kicking this up against cartoons and comics and movie classics is just plain
wrong. The comics this summer pretty much dominated it: Iron Man, Hulk, Dark
Knight. It's plain to see how next year's competition will be. I think this
is a big mistake.
Jade
jamelia says:
It doesn't have anything at all to do with the type of movie competition
over the long term, it has to do with competition on the weekend of release. And
that's what shouldn't be a problem that weekend next July.
In the past couple of years, the movie business has really been all about
opening weekend. If a movie doesn't pull in really huge numbers that first
weekend, it's considered something of a failure. Personally, I think it's nuts.
The biggest movies rake in cash for a fair amount of time from repeat ticket
buyers. Since I'm not a movie executive, however, my opinion doesn't mean much.
Sometimes two big or similar movies open on the same weekend. Usually, one
of them suffers. When two very dissimilar movies open on the same weekend, this
may not happen. An example from this summer was the release of "The Dark
Knight" and "Mamma Mia!" on the same weekend. Since they drew two different
types of audiences, both movies did extremely well.
Because of the long Writer's Strike, there aren't enough "blockbuster"
movies to open every weekend next summer, apparently. The big special
effects-laden movies for 2009 were the ones most affected by the strike, because their
scripts had to be ready to start filming early enough for principal photography
to be completed and the special effects completed for the release. Harry
Potter isn't the same as Transformers in that sense...but it certainly has its
share of special effects, and it's a major movie release. When you consider
how many millions of dollars the Potter movies cost to make and to market. I
can't really blame them too much for trying to get the most favorable opening
date. (It used to be said that the amount of money spent to market a movie was
as much as to make it! I'm not sure that's still true, but it's many
millions of dollars/pounds/euros anyway).
In another year, I would be extremely suspicious that problems with the
movie was the real reason for the delay. This year, I think I can believe them,
and maybe forgive them for the wait--as long as they don't delay the Deathly
Hallows movies, as they've promised in the story.
And yes, movie release dates are changed all the time, sometimes because
there are problems, but other times in order to jockey for a better release time
for economic reasons...sometimes they're even pushed to a sooner date, if
the movie can be finished on time.Some of those movies cited above might end up
being delayed because of productions problems themselves (Shia LeBeouf's car
accident and its repercussions, for example, could interfere with
Transformers II.)
jamelia
**************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive