[HPFGU-Movie] Re: Two-part DH film confirmed
Valerie Flowe
valerie.flowe at verizon.net
Thu Mar 13 12:12:38 UTC 2008
I am very excited about the two parts and not dropping any of the
storyline (they could, IMO, speed up the endless camping scenes, though
Frodo and Sam were on that journey for a veeeeerrrrry long time as
well!)
But why 2010 and 2011? They've been cranking the films out once a year
now, haven't they? I can't wait that long!!
Valerie
On Mar 12, 2008, at 8:12 PM, zanooda2 wrote:
> --- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, "Carol" <justcarol67 at ...> wrote:
>
> > I guess Ron rescuing Harry and saying, "Are you mental?" with
> > an exchanged glance and "To Be Continued" flashed across the
> > screen.
>
> zanooda:
>
> Yeah, this sounds about right :-). But they may want to include in
> the first part the locket!Horcrux destruction as well, although I
> can't think of a convenient breaking point after this scene. I guess
> they would want to pack some more stuff into the first part, because
> all of the Hogwarts events and battle will take a lot of screen time
> in the second part, plus Malfoy manor and Gringotts.
>
> > Carol:
>
> > Anyway, surely "The Doe Patronus" is the right point at which
> > to end the first film. But that would mean they'd open with the
> > endless camping trip and Xenophilius Lovegood.
>
> zanooda:
>
> The camping trip is almost over by the time of "The Silver Doe", and
> the scene at Xeno's include not only the reding of the book, but
> action-escape as well, so I think it'll be OK.
>
> > Carol:
>
> > Or maybe, they could end Part I with Harry following the
> > mysterious Patronus and open the next film with his rescue
> > and the reunion.
>
> zanooda:
>
> Very possible, but I personally like your first suggestion more :-).
> Besides, that'll be packing too much action into the second film.
> We'll just wait and see, I guess :-).
>
>
>
More information about the HPFGU-Movie
archive