Harry to get naked in next film

[bgrugin]

--- In HPFGU-Movie at yahoogroups.com, Brian <brian at ...> wrote:
>
> replying to eggplant107:
> 
> > Harry to get naked in next film
> > http://www.imdb.com/news/ni1273235/
> 
> Just don't bother following the link FROM that page to the Guardian's 
> original article.  For a newspaper which used to pride itself on accuracy it's fallen a lot.
> 
> 
> The Guardian writer said neither scene was in the book and suggested 
> that the producer added it gratuitously to compete with some unknown 
> film about vampires.
> 
> Of course, anyone who has actually READ the book will know that both 
> scenes are in there.  The writer of the article obviously misread Yates' interview in Spanish where he said the DANCE wasn't in the book.
> 
> Oh well, another journalistic icon bites the dust.
> 
> Brian
>


MusicalBetsy here:
I just read the Guardian article, and they now have a correction (added today) stating that in the interview, David Yates was discussing two new scenes NOT in the book, along with the nude scenes, which ARE in the book (the horcrux scene and the King's Cross scene).  I can understand Harry being 'naked' for the King's Cross scene, but unless they are suggesting that Harry and Hermione were intimate with one another, it doesn't make much sense for them to be naked in the horcrux scene.  Hmmm - hope it is still age appropriate for upper elementary/middle school kids.  It would be a bummer if it isn't!