Houses and plans (was Re: Language with a flourish)
pengolodh_sc at yahoo.no
pengolodh_sc at yahoo.no
Fri Apr 13 15:48:53 UTC 2001
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at y..., Sheryll Townsend <s_ings at y...> wrote:
[snip]
> Oddly enough, I prefer the first description. Granted, the
> language is a bit flowery, but I found details there that
> weren't in second description (for example, the second makes
> no mention of the laundry room, or the fact the guest room has
> a 'full bath'). Maybe it's just me, but I like to know these
> things.
>
> Sheryll, who went through the whole house-hunting
> thing 4 years ago
I see your point, of course, though the description of course came
along with a plan.
I was intrigued when I learnt that in USA there was a tradition for
buying only the plans, and then make individual arrangements with
builders and contranctors - in Norway, when you buy a house from a
catalogue, you buy the house - finished to the key in the entrance-
door. You do meet with a consultant from the company, and you're
allowed to make requests for changes in the layout, which generally
does not cost much if it does not interfere with the load-bearing
structure.
One result of this is that there is less diversity of models, since
the company has to be stocked with the materials to build the
different designs. All the plan-makers have to do is to make sure
that the plans don't fall foul of whatever new nationwide building-
codes that are introduced - otherwise I would think they can keep the
drawings in their archives for ever.
In general, Norwegian houses tend to be in a pseudo modern-
traditional style, normally taking traditional elements from empire,
which in Norway expressed itself most oftenly in houses rather
similar to Cape Cod-style (clapboard-siding, 1 1/2 or 2-story simple
building, steep roof, etc.). Seeing that plans are readily available
in such a great variety of traditional styles in USA really
fascinated me, and many of the have much more appeal than the designs
available here.
In general, I find that for some reason the hosues that were
offered/designed before the 90s generally are more appealing - recent
designs seem somehow bland - this is true (forme, at least) both for
Norway and USA.
Best regards
Christian Stubø
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive