FW: Contest #10 results - further discussion

[Hillman, Lee]

> > Message: 10
> >    Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 20:26:48 -0000
> >    From: joym999 at aol.com
> > Subject: HP4GU Contest #10 results
> > 
> > Only three people -- Rucha, Catlady and Julie -- felt creative this 
> > week, but they all have submitted great suggestions.  Julie, in 
> > particular, has offered enough fun and games to keep any 
> bunch of HP 
> > fans amused for days.  Thanks very much to our three creative 
> > people.  A new contest will be posted tomorrow.
> > 
> 
> I just want to take a moment to personally and publicly thank 
> Rucha, Catlady, and Julie for their responses to this 
> contest. I also want to thank Joywitch for putting this 
> contest on her schedule so accommodatingly!
> 
> I passed the question on to Joywitch when a friend of mine 
> asked me. I thought immediately that it was the kind of thing 
> HP4GU would love to talk about.
> 
> These are all great ideas and with you ladies' permission, I 
> will pass them on to my friend, who wanted some ideas for a 
> situation in a role-playing game. 
> 
> That's the second part of this post: I do want to talk a 
> little more about this topic, but as it is no longer a 
> contest, the thread should move to OT-Chatter. Anyone who is 
> interested, please reply there.
> 
> Catlady mentioned trying to figure out how to simulate magic 
> at the faire. And I guess I should have been clearer in my 
> post to Joywitch, because the contest didn't make it clear: 
> in the situation where these games and ideas will be put to 
> (virtual) "use," the hosts of the faire DO have access to 
> magic. They have to be careful, just like wizards, and no, 
> they are not wizards, but they are NOT LIMITED to what is 
> technologically possible. In other words, they could make 
> broomsticks fly, if they wanted.
> 
> So, if you had access to magic and could overhaul a 
> Renaissance Pleasure Faire into a Harry Potter themed faire, 
> what would you do? Please join me on OT-Chatter to discuss this.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Gwendolyn Grace
>