Lord of the Rings
rhiannon333au
rhiannon333 at hotmail.com
Wed Dec 19 17:10:01 UTC 2001
A question so often asked by first time readers of LotR. Although
it is not everyone's cup of tea, in my opinion, it is really worth
the effort. It was not voted the book of the century (20th of
course!) for nothing. I won't embarass myself and reveal my vast
age by telling you how many times I have now reread and
enjoyed it, but I can recommend you persevere.
Advice I have heard, and think is not bad, is to skip the Prologue,
and even to start as late as the beginning of Book 2 (meaning,
the chapter Many Meetings). Later on, once you are quite into it,
you can go back and reread the parts you skipped.
I think it could be difficult for some readers, going from HP to
LotR, given how different the books are in so many ways, while
of course there are elements in common. HP is far more
accessible, with more light and shade; LotR has a more
complex and deeply layered universe which it inhabits, which
takes a bit of getting used to for some readers (although for
others, it is almost the best feature of the books - such as those
who learn to write and speak Elvish, for example!). The mass of
detail and the lengthy descriptive passages can be offputting on
an initial read, so I would say you could skip a lot of the
description of the journey, the countryside etc, with no loss. Later
on, once you get into it, you may find you will want to go back and
reread those parts, or the whole thing ( as I have, so many
times!)
Good luck with your efforts and I hope you end up persevering
Sofie.
Megan
-- In HPFGU-OTChatter at y..., "sofie_elisabeth"
<sofie_elisabeth at y...> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I've just (literally) started reading the fisrt book, as part of a
> bet with my boyfriend (if I read Lord of the Rings he'll read Harry
> Potter and then we'll go see both films...)but I'm finding it
really
> hard to get into. Anyone have any advice on when it gets easier
to
> understand?
>
> Sofie
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive