[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Aliteracy - something that doesn't apply to any of us...
Ebony Elizabeth Thomas
ebonyink at hotmail.com
Tue May 15 02:41:18 UTC 2001
>--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at y..., heidit at n... wrote:
> > There's an interesting article in the Washington Post today at
> > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23370-2001May13.html
> > about people who can read, but choose not to.
> >
Thanks for sharing this, Heidi. Coming from a context where most of my
friends and family *are* aliterate by this definition, I can see both sides.
My sisters can read very well, but don't like to and never have. Yet they
have other spheres they enjoy and excel in. The 20-year old is an
autoworker who is excellent with her hands and is taking an advanced
machinist course... I took one look at her textbook and shuddered at all the
complicated how-to diagrams. I can put stuff together, but I don't like to
and I know she can do it much better. She has a voice that could wring
tears from the stars and practices her singing a lot... I can carry a tune,
but that's about it. She was a much better athlete than I was in high
school. And so on.
The 17-year old is a visual arts major who has won awards on the local,
state, and national level for her artwork. She can draw *anything*. I
can't even draw stick figures. She also has a sense of fashion and style
that is beyond awesome (inherited from our mother--I was passed by)... she
designs and makes her own clothes. Finally, she's a dance minor at her
performing arts school... and excels at that too. Me, I have to see a step
at least 15-20 times before it clicks.
Both of them are fascinated by my love of the Harry Potter series, and can't
wait to see the movie, but neither of them were enthused about reading the
series. They've both read SS, and the 17 year old got halfway through CoS
(which is a *shock*--they actually were *reading* and it wasn't for
school!), they both raved about it, but aren't interested in re-reading 50
times like big sis. But when HP comes out on DVD/VHS, rest assured that the
20 year old will buy it, and they'll both watch it over and over again.
Just like they did with Gulliver's Travels, The Odyssey, 10th Kingdom, etc.
It took me a long time for me to break out of my Percy shell and realize
their aliteracy wasn't *bad*. It was just *different*. While I was
reading, writing, and playing music, they did other stuff. And?
I'm sure that all of us, if we're honest, can think of stuff that the
non-readers we know do in place of reading. These people can read, but
choose not to do it more than they have to and think we're weird because we
read all the time.
So the time that non-readers spend not reading, they develop skills, hobbies
and interests that we bookaholics don't choose to cultivate.
Also let's consider the fact that universal literacy is a relatively new
concept in human history.
This is an interesting topic... we had lots of discussion about this in my
seminar last semester in Literacy and Technology. The conclusion we came up
with--we may just have to re-invent our notions of "literacy" and reconsider
just what constitutes it.
--Ebony
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
Ebony AKA AngieJ
ebonyink at hotmail.com
Come join us in Paradise!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HP_Paradise
Visit Schnoogle.com:
http://www.geocities.com/heiditandy/
"Not that great German master in his dream
Of harmonies that thundered amongst the stars
At the creation, ever heard a theme
Nobler than 'Go down, Moses.' Mark its bars--
How like a mighty trumpet-call they stir
The blood. Such are the notes that men have sung
Going to valorous deeds; such tones there were
That helped make history when Time was young."
--James Weldon Johnson, composer, Negro National Anthem
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive