State capitals
dfrankiswork at netscape.net
dfrankiswork at netscape.net
Wed Oct 10 21:29:49 UTC 2001
On the main list, Amy posted:
>But capitals are located where they are through odd convolutions of
Muggle history; they are frequently not the biggest city in the
state, nor centrally located; they became the capitals because there
was something convenient or politically expedient about them at the
time they were founded (a lot have changed, BTW).
I sense one of those endless threads...
I had always imagined that state capitals were deliberately chosen
for their obscurity, on the rather vague philosophy that Big Cities
are Bad Things, and that Government is also a Bad Thing, so to allow
the two to get together would be a Historical Mistake.
Unfortunately, the strategy tends to be a long term failure, as
people tend to go where the government is ('I am an outsider, so vote
for me so I can be an insider' 'OK, so long as you give me a job'),
so you just end up with big cities in places where there is no good
reason for a city to be.
See also Brasilia, Canberra, Islamabad, etc.
David
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive