Sport/Nonsport
macloudt
macloudt at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Feb 24 13:25:06 UTC 2002
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at y..., "cindysphynx" <cindysphynx at h...> wrote:
> So IMO sports can stay in the Olympics if:
>
> 1. There is an element of risk that something will go wrong;
> 2. There is physical exertion (mental exertion isn't enough,
because
> if it were, there would be an Olympic event called "Cross-
> Examination");
> 3. It is something people might actually do in real life (this
rules
> out things like flinging a ribbon around while doing flips); and
> 4. People can watch it without snickering (this rules out
> synchronized swimming).
The one "sport" whose inclusion would turn me off the Olympics
forever is *darts*. Yes, skill is involved...I for one should never
be allowed to through blunt objects around in public, never mind
sharp ones...but have you *seen* these guys? Last I
heard, "athletes" didn't look as if they had 2 family-sized pizzas
and a 12-pack of Bud for breakfast. Next to these guys, I look like
Twiggy. I can handle the BBC showing darts from time to time
whenever big events are on, but calling it a sport is pushing it. We
should come up with a new word for such "sports", any and all which
don't meet with Cindy's nifty 4-point system. Any takers?
Mary Ann
(who enjoys watching snooker, but wouldn't call that a sport either)
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive