Main List Problems
Catlady (Rita Prince Winston)
catlady at wicca.net
Sun Aug 17 22:31:51 UTC 2003
I've become a curmudgeon who no longer wishes Happy Birthdays on OT,
but *please* don't start a new list: I already have more lists than I
have time to read!
Wendy St John wrote:
<< I posted it to the main list because I figured if I posted it
here, the vast majority of people who I feel need to read it wouldn't
have ever seen it. >>
I read and enjoyed your post (and those of James Redmont and others
who are trying to educate the ignorant posters) but I've gotten the
feeling that the people who don't read the answers to their questions
don't read ADMIN or advisory posts either, so I am considering
assigning myself to a one-purrson QUEST to educate them by sending
individual off-list e-mails to the offenders (polite, gentle e-mails
that don't let them know they're "offenders") but that would add so
much time to the already burdensome task of reading a week's posts
(which kept me up til 5AM this morning last night).
Silmariel wrote:
<< You seem to know each other, as a group, so maybe you are
coordinated enough to select some topics for discussion and launch
them. >>
Not all newbies are ignorant newbies. Don't iron your hands.
I personally vote against discussion topics or chapter discussions: I
feel that would only INCREASE list volume, and high volume (much of
the excess consisting of "noise") is part of the problem, as Cindy C
said.
Kirstini wrote:
<< The last response I made was to email a newbie who was objecting
to SILK GOWNS being used as an acronym because no-one in canon wore a
silk gown, and say something along the lines of "well, you're new.
Obviously you don't know how we do things around here", which I'm now
despising myself for. >>
Don't despise yourself! I loved your post -- I was so glad that
someone was brave enough to say that.
<< everyone is mourning the fact that their favourite posters aren't
posting anymore. >>
Therefore, I am not anyone's favorite poster. QED. *sniffle*
(Actually, I didn't expect that I was.)
Pshemekan wrote:
<< OTOH I think there is easy way to fix (although not 100% nice):
now moderators accepts any letter based on it's formal value --
proper quoting and is it on topic. I think that they should block
e-mails based on it's merit. I mean, they should stop all those --
"Why Harry didn't saw thestrals in GOF". Some letters should never be
seen by us >>
I think that would be an effective but not easy solution: newbies
stay moderated a little while, during which moderators reject/return
their posts for asking questions that are already in the VFAQ or OoP
FAQ, with a boilerplate explanation about the FAQs, and reject/return
their posts for inadequate snipping, again with a boilerplate
explanation. The problem is: so many posts, so few Mods and Elves.
Dan Darkthirty wrote:
<< We should, though, have a place where people keep their theses,
and develop them. >>
I don't have a problem with theories being developed on the main
list. But I have recently been wondering if I need a webpage page to
store my theories, to which I could refer posters about Number of
Students and Wizarding Economy and so on, instead of keeping my
theories in .txt files and pasting them into reply posts, thus adding
to list volume. Btw IIRC I said something nice about you on Main List
yesterday, but I don't remember what.
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive