Rumsfeld, Bush, and Prescott
davewitley
dfrankiswork at netscape.net
Tue Dec 2 23:54:54 UTC 2003
walked into a bar one day and...
Actually, I think the Rumsfeld quote is quite interesting. I
haven't followed his activities closely, but as I understand it,
while he may be a bete noire to Europeans and the left, the people
he has really picked a fight with (Saddam might be surprised to
learn this) are the US military.
This quote sounds like it might partly be about shaking up the
mindset of the military. Working out what you know and then
determining how to find out the things you don't know is what
intelligence (in the military sense) is all about. And, in terms of
doctrine, this is about having a plan, and then using your
intelligence capability to fill in the blanks in your plan -
Rumsfeld's 'known unknowns'. IOW, spyplanes and the like don't fly
around hoping to discover interesting things which then inform the
strategic planning; they are sent out on specific missions to find
out the things commanders need to know to execute their plan.
Rumsfeld may have been saying that, particularly in a world where
enemies don't fight symmetrically (giant armies grinding each other
down) it might be a good idea to think laterally and consider you
may have information coming in which does more than fill in the
blanks. I think, intellectually, he's up to that.
Now, concerning Bush, I think that while it's possible to be very
amusing at his expense, in fact his *meaning* is nearly always
clear. When he talks about 'misunderestimating' or 'Grecians' you
know what he meant to say. So I don't really think he's in the
running for the Foot in Mouth awards as conceived, which are about
cleaning up gobbledegook.
For sheer incomprehensibility, you do need John Prescott. I can't
cite examples, because they just aren't snappy and memorable -
they're 'huh?' moments.
David, always happy to put in a good word for W.
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive