Age suitability of canon
melclaros <melclaros@yahoo.com>
melclaros at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 18 21:47:07 UTC 2003
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "aurigae_prime
<ZaraLyon at a...>" <ZaraLyon at a...> wrote:
> --- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, Melpomene wrote:
>
> If I recall correctly, there was a discussion (this summer, I
think)
> about gifted children, in which many of the group discussed having
> been precocious and/or gifted children. Which may be why some of us
> feel that the canon is suitable for younger children.
I'm *not* talking about the occasional exceptional child (and just so
we're on the same page here, both chidren referred to in my previous
post are in fact "gifted" by whatever definition is being used by
schools these days--IQ is one that I know of--being annoyingly
precocious is certainly another) who FINDS a book on their own and
devours it. Yes that most certainly happens. I am talking about the
more common situation where a PARENT finds it absolutely necessary to
jump on the bandwagon and because she (almost always a she) reads or
hears 1. the the books are Enormously Popular! and/or 2. Janet
Jones' seven year old read it and had no problem so what's wrong with
yours?
This parent runs out and in quick succession force reads material to
a young child that is, in the opinion of the *writer herself*,
inappropriate for a child that age!
We also must make a diferentiation between what a child is able to
READ and what that same child is able to UNDERSTAND. Yes, even a
GIFTED child. Sure they understand more big words and possibly even
some more adult concepts. But it is the RARE seven year old, gifted
or otherwise who is ready to fully appreciate PoA at any more than
face value. (I use PoA as my example instead of GoF because in my
personal opinion it is a far more complex and compelling story) It is
a RARE, seven year old, gifted or otherwise who will benefit at all
from reading the graveyard scene in GoF. The point here is not "No 7
year old should ever EVER read GoF" but "WHY does a 7 year old NEED
to read GoF?" I do not censor my children's reading. I don't have to.
(Neither one of them reads enough to bother, dammit, but currently
Son is reading LOTR and Daugter is reading something by LeGuin--
Catwings?) Face it, the AVERAGE 7 year old is not going to gravitate
to a 700 page book with no pictures. Period.
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive