cliquishness was Astronomical Errors (was:Clay Shirky on social software
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Mon Jul 7 18:48:11 UTC 2003
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Shaun Hately"
<drednort at a...> wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2003 at 23:05, Catlady (Rita Prince Winston) wrote:
>
> > --- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "Shaun Hately"
<drednort at a...>
> > wrote:
> > Perhaps they will be added to the list of worthwhile posters
when recommended by a known worthwhile posters who DOES
read their posts, > or from becoming known in chat..
>
> Yes, could happen - my point is though, that I think these
things are concerned and as I don't think most people want to
see the list become cliquish, it's something worth considering.
>
People who want to limit their reading only to particular
persons and/or topics can form another list very easily. HPfGU
has spawned quite a few groups of this kind, eg Snapefans,
HP-fanfiction, and of course OT-Chatter itself.
While this may create cliques in the HP fan community,
and HPfGU itself had been accused of cliquishness, it does
keep down the formation of cliques within a particular group
Reading only posts by certain people doesn't isolate you from
contact with the rest of the main list unless all of those people
are following the same strategy and never replying to anyone
outside the selected group. Since the moderation system
assures that all newbie posts are read by an old hand, reading
only old hands may actually mitigate against this sort of closed
circle.
Pippin
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive