[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: New Question: Brit Royalty ...?

Shaun Hately drednort at alphalink.com.au
Sat Nov 1 01:29:06 UTC 2003


On 1 Nov 2003 at 12:24, Shaun Hately wrote:

> On 31 Oct 2003 at 22:26, pengolodh_sc wrote:
> 
> > will take well to a new King Arthur at this stage, and King Philip 
> > has no tradition as a name within the British line of Sovereigns.  
> 
> Actually it does - but only a very slight one and not one anyone is likely to want to 
> dredge up - Philip II of Spain, was proclaimed King of England after his marriage 
> to Mary II.

Sorry - Mary I - Mary Tudor. I get the numbers confused more than I should (-8


Yours Without Wax, Dreadnought
Shaun Hately | www.alphalink.com.au/~drednort/thelab.html
(ISTJ)       | drednort at alphalink.com.au | ICQ: 6898200 
"You know the very powerful and the very stupid have one
thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the 
facts. They alter the facts to fit the views. Which can be 
uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that 
need altering." The Doctor - Doctor Who: The Face of Evil
Where am I: Frankston, Victoria, Australia





More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter archive