[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: Most boring sport
rvotaw at i-55.com
rvotaw at i-55.com
Mon Oct 20 15:50:39 UTC 2003
> Horse Racing... a sport... for the horses only. (Jockeys are just dead
> weight, IMHO.)
> Rodeo... a sport... kinda. (You may disagree, but most of those things
> require a lot of durability and ability.)
I find these two comparisons amusing. In one (horse racing) you describe the
jockey as dead weight. But in the other a lot of durability and ability is
required. I consider them both sports, but I can't see how rodeo could be
considered a sport while the jockey part of horse racing is not. I've been a
fan of horse racing for, oh, over 15 years. For the first few years I thought,
wow, that looks like fun, must be great to be a jockey, just hop up there and
hang on, right? Wrong. I've ridden horses since I was six, and that's easy
enough, once you learn. Riding race horses is a lot different. For starters,
just holding the position isn't that easy. I've tried this, not on a real
horse, but on an electronic horse thing at the Kentucky Derby museum. It is
murder on the legs, I can't imagine doing it for 2 minutes straight, not once,
but many times throughout a day. Not to mention you don't just sit up there
and hang on, actual use of the brain and quick reflexes are required. Which
is why jockeys get a suspension for interfering with other horses, and not the
horse. :)
Richelle
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive