Info for FF moderators and writers. (sort of Humour)
psychic_serpent
psychic_serpent at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 31 17:28:19 UTC 2004
--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, udder_pen_dragon
<udderpd at y...> wrote:
> Eye halve run this poem threw it,
> I am shore your pleased two no.
> Its letter perfect awl the weigh,
> my chequer tolled me sew.
>
> Sauce unknown.
>
> This I now dedicate to all Fiction Alley Moderators who believe
> that a comma is more important than the story or the meaning of
> words.
A few points:
1) Thanks for pointing out that you cannot rely upon a spell checker
(or "chequer") to eliminate misspellings from writing. If you use
the wrong word but something that is still a word a spell checker
will not catch it. At FA we get people all of the time who are
flagged for having too many spelling errors and say, "But I ran it
through a spell checker!"
2) You'll notice that in the quoted section above another error that
was (hopefully) purposefully included was the wrong version
of "its." This is one of the FA Unforgivable Errors, chiefly
because we have found that authors who make errors with apostrophes
tend to do so all through their submissions and we felt it was an
onerous chore for fic screeners to have to wade through the entire
thing to count all of the apostrophe errors.
This is also why we only base the number of allowable errors in a
submission on its length up to a point; the length may mean that
more than thirty errors COULD be allowed but we feel that it is also
onerous to force screeners to count up more than thirty errors in
any one file and have made that our error cap, regardless of length.
3) Commas are very, very important, especially in dialogue
punctuation. Correctly capitalizing or not capitalizing the text
adjacent to the dialogue is also important, as well as using an
appropriate verb to describe the act of speech. //"Please come in,"
she stepped back to allow them to enter.// This is not correct. A
sentence containing a quote must have a subject (speaker), speaking
verb and object (the quote itself). This is akin to writing //She
yelled her food.// The verb and object simply do not match. (So,
you see, we DO believe that the meaning of words is important.) If
you are unwilling to correctly format your dialogue, even though you
are writing for fun, please start your own archive; do not put
people through reading such stuff--which is NOT fun--unless they
make the mistake of going to your personal archive.
4) At FA the story is the last thing we find to be important since
we do not judge anyone's actual plotting, charactization, etc. As
Heidi noted this would be far too subjective. We do require
something to tie a work to the Potterverse (since it is a Harry
Potter archive) but we also allow virtually anything if a fic is
labeled an AU (alternate universe). Trust me, you really wouldn't
want us judging plots and other content-based elements of our
submissions. Everyone has a different idea about what would be an
acceptable submission; we use the most objective criteria possible
to screen submissions but do not require perfection--just
competence.
As mentioned, there is an "allowable" error count for all
submissions based on length, and when a submission is rather long we
allow a maximum of thirty errors. This means that a longish
submission with twenty-eight errors will be uploaded as long as none
are Unforgivables, so you WILL see fics with errors on the site. We
do not claim otherwise. This still means that a great deal of
material is rejected for not meeting these standards, which are
hardly draconian. If you believe that you are writing a better
story, as far as content, than the great unwashed masses, then you
should also move yourself to put your story's best foot forward in
terms of the "window dressing." Don't expect someone to "look past"
egregious errors to find your fabulous story; that is unfair and
unreasonable.
5) A woman in Columbus, Ohio had a disagreement with the
owner/manager of a local boutique (she was not permitted to return
an item without a receipt) and so she wrote to the New York Times
about it. Actually, that didn't happen, but that is analagous to
your having a problem with the standards at FA and posting here
about it. You are free to vent, of course, as is anyone (we have
never attempted to quash dissent), but it is still odd to do it in
this venue and does not reflect well on you, since you are by
implication revealing to quite a lot of people that you were
evidently incapable of adhering to some really very reasonable and
simple submission standards.
6) A few good beta readers could help you a great deal and I highly
recommend that you look for some if you do not feel up to doing your
own dialogue formatting. I use about six beta readers, two of which
do Britpicking. The importance of other eyes cannot ever be
discounted.
Best of luck,
Barb (not speaking for FA Mods)
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive