[HPFGU-OTChatter] Re: UN and Iraq
Shaun Hately
drednort at alphalink.com.au
Sat Oct 2 01:05:18 UTC 2004
On 30 Sep 2004 at 21:19, olivier.fouquet+harry at m4x.org wrote:
> I would like to outline one last time what my ideal situation would
> have been. I would have liked the inspectors to be asked clearly if
> they were in favor of invasion, limited strike (à la Desert Fox) or
> simply continued inspections.
Just one more thing I want to address here, because I think it
illustrates a rather significant problem that the media has helped
create.
The weapons inspectors in Iraq were not, and are not, experts on
warfare, or military strategy, or international law.
Some are diplomats, others are scientists, a few have some military
experience. But they were, and are, experts on weapons of mass
destruction. A few have other qualifications, but in general terms,
they are *not* qualified in any way, shape or form, to venture a
meaningful opinion about whether or not military action would be a
wise idea, or what form that military action should take.
Asking the inspectors where they were in favour of invasion would
have made no sense - because they are not trained or qualified in
that area.
They are certainly as entitled as anyone else to their own personal
opinion but they are most certainly not able to venture an expert
opinion on anything outside their field of expertise.
For some reason, some sections of the media have given the
impression at times that these inspectors are far more qualified
than they are, in areas that many know nothing about at all.
Asking the inspectors whether or not military action should take
place, makes about as much sense as asking an army officer whether
the Kyoto protocol should be ratified. It's not in their area of
expertise.
The weapons inspectors were asked about their areas of expertise.
They were asked if they could successfully either find the weapons,
or confirm their non-existence. Their answer, in their official
reports and replies (not interviews they have given to the media,
but what they wrote down in official documents) was that unless
Iraq gave full co-operation, while they might find weapons that
existed, they could never hope to confirm their non-existence. And
Iraq never gave full co-operation, and never showed any signs that
it would.
Yours Without Wax, Dreadnought
Shaun Hately | www.alphalink.com.au/~drednort/thelab.html
(ISTJ) | drednort at alphalink.com.au | ICQ: 6898200
"You know the very powerful and the very stupid have one
thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the
facts. They alter the facts to fit the views. Which can be
uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that
need altering." The Doctor - Doctor Who: The Face of Evil
Where am I: Frankston, Victoria, Australia
More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter
archive