[HPFGU-OTChatter] Invasion to Iraq (was Re: UN intervention (was Animal Farm)

[Przemyslaw Plaskowicki]

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:59:24 -0000, naamagatus <naama_gat at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Which seems to show that there were never any WMDs at all . I don't
> know whether I'm reading you correctly, but do you think that Iraq
> should have been invaded *regardless* of the WMD issue?
> 

My views at that matter are very radical. I believe that Iraq should
be invaded. At least Iraqi people get rid of Sadam Hussain. But later
North Korea should be invaded too. And Belarus, Cuba and many poverty
and civil war stricken African countries should be invaded as well. In
many countries people are suffering and civilised world does nothing.
Only solution to save those people is to install (by force if
necessary) everywhere in the world democratic governments based on
local customs and local people.

Unfortunately in case of Iraq invasion, there is better chance that
Iraq was invaded because Dubya felt that he must be better than his
daddy, than WMDs and Hussain's attrocities combined.

I can not share my belief that deaths in Iraq are thanks to serious
mismanagement and misunderstandings on behalf of US commands. There is
Polish saying: "to behave like an elephant in the china shop" -- i.e.
very clumsy and breaking many things.  It looks like US troops are
behaving like that, and in the effect there is spiral of violence
similar to that in the Israel/Palestine. To show the values of
democracy Iraqi people should be treated with more kindler. Even after
bombings and killings, to show that US troops came in peace every
Iraqi should be treated as US president himself. In short they should
be nice despite the not-niceness of some Iraqis.

I am a Pole and my country actively participate with Iraq occupation.
There is even a Polish occupational zone.

-- 
Przemyslaw 'Pshemekan' Plaskowicki