Probs at the end of GOF!!

sandra87b sandra87b at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Feb 15 21:30:49 UTC 2005


--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "xcpublishing" 
<xcpublishing at y...> wrote:
> 
> >How did the Potter house get destroyed?
> 
> Sandra:
> >It's not just 'HOW' but it's also 'WHY' - in so far as WHY didn't 
> >Dumbledore or MacGonnagle give the Time Turner a little spin and 
> take out Lord 
> >He-Who-Is-Convenient at his great moment of weakness after the 
> event, 
> >or prepare a little 'welcome' for him BEFORE the event.. oh the 
> folly of 
> >the TT...
> 
> Exactly!  I really hate that Time Turner.  They can only use it for 
> trivial purposes... oh except in one case where they managed to 
> actually save someone, but that was because the person was 
> mysteriously saved and could only have been saved with someone using 
> a Time Turner, otherwise they wouldn't have been saved.  Twisted, 
> horrible logic.
> 
> Nicky Joe


Cheers Nicky Joe! It IS twisted, horrible logic - but what's most disturbing is 
how many millions of people don't mind one little bit! No joke, I was starting to 
think it was just me. There's been so many straw-clutching theories dreamed 
up on the formal topic pages, all of which can be summed up in one sentence 
- "JKR can do no wrong". Well she can and she did, in this instance. I like the 
books more or less, but the TT was a mistake to introduce, and wasn't even 
incorporated properly into the story. Harry can't save himself from a fate 
worse than death, because he needed to survive it in the first place in order 
to go back through time to save himself. That doesn't work! How many times 
do people need something so simple spelling out?

Sandra, feeling much better for having said that.







More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter archive